(CARICOM Secretariat, Turkeyen, Greater Georgetown,
Guyana) Regional disaster risk management planning
must break the “cycle of vulnerability” as without
effective strategies to mitigate the risks linked to
the agriculture sector, poverty reduction would not
occur.
These sentiments were expressed on Wednesday at
the Caribbean Regional Disaster Management
Symposium, currently underway in Antigua at the
Jolly Beach Resort, by Dr. Vincent Little,
Coordinator of the Caribbean Technical Agenda of the
Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on
Agriculture (IICA). He was at the time speaking on
the current situation and outlook for agricultural
risk management in the Caribbean.
“Hazards do not necessarily become disasters, it
is the combination of hazards and the level of
vulnerability that intensify the impacts of
disasters,” he said, adding that the Region’s
vulnerability to natural disasters was a development
deficit.
Dr. Little stated that the development of
appropriate mechanisms to reduce the Region’s
vulnerability to disasters was crucial as the Region
was characterised by Small Island Developing States
(SIDS) and Low Lying Coastal States (LLCS). Leaving
no room for comfort, he said, was the fact that 70
per cent of all economic activities took place
within a two-mile radius of the coastline, and 60
per cent of the population resided in the coastal
zone.
Given these realities, Dr. Little stressed the
need for an institutional framework to build
resilience in the agriculture sector. Past
experiences of the impact of disasters on the
sector- the US$ 54.4 million in losses to flooding
in Guyana in 2005 and the US$ 36.6 million losses in
Grenada to Ivan in 2004- should inspire action, he
stated.
“The Region cannot continue to rely on costly
extra-regional development assistance for
reconstruction after a major catastrophe,” Dr.
Little stated, adding that this “reactive stance”
was costly.
He said that the Symposium, which was
facilitating an exchange of ideas among key
stakeholders on disaster risk management in
agriculture, had presented a “defining moment” in
ascertaining the role of the sector as a
“fundamental mean of alleviating poverty and as an
engine of growth.”
Currently, disaster risk management was starved
of adequate resources and sometimes it was used as a
political tool, Dr. Little said. He suggested that
this could be addressed through institutional
framework of adequate and structured risk management
measures at the regional, national and community
levels.
The ICCA official said that such a framework
should include the establishment of an Office of
Chief Agricultural Risk Officer in Caribbean
countries; training and public education; and
enhanced collaboration among key stakeholders
including the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), the
Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (CDEMA),
the Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF);
and the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the
United Nations.
In developing the Region’s capacity for
agriculture disaster preparedness, he posited, it
was necessary to implement response and mitigation
strategies; design and implement of risk transfer
measures; and provide agricultural risk financing
with greater inputs by governments.
Another critical component Dr Little posited was
the availability of hazard information, and for
disaster risk measures to be factored into the
planning process for agricultural development. In
this context, he said that closer collaboration with
the Caribbean Institute for Hydrology and
Meteorology (CIHM) would be useful in drought and
flood analysis and monitoring and for the
development of early warning systems.
Dr. Little noted also that the issue of praedial
larcency linked to the deficient and uncoordinated
risk management measures in the agriculture sector
should not be overlooked. In this regard, he called
for a review of the state of praedial larceny in the
Region; greater public awareness on the issue; and
institutionalised farm record keeping.
CONTACT:
piu@caricom.org