It is my pleasure to be present at this important
Ministerial Meeting on HIV and Development in Latin
America and the Caribbean, when representatives from
across our Hemisphere try to grapple with the
critical developments, consolidate approaches and
shape new initiatives for an adequate response to
the disease that has challenged the World for over
20 years. I wish to congratulate UNECLAC, PAHO and
the Caribbean Community Secretariat for their joint
effort that has resulted in this gathering today. I
also join the Chairman in offering a warm welcome to
all of you, and in particular our colleagues from
Latin America
Permit me to refer to the close alliance between
the Caribbean Community and the various groupings in
Central and South America. The bond of friendship
demonstrated at the Fifth Summit of the Americas in
Port-of-Spain is the latest manifestation of Latin
America and Caribbean relations.
I am pleased to be involved in this attempt to
follow up on The Mexico Declaration 2008 aimed at
strengthening the multicultural approaches to HIV
prevention, by engaging Ministers and officials of
the Education and Health Sectors. Indeed the
gathering in Mexico at the Seventeenth International
AIDS Conference did establish benchmarks for
strengthening prevention efforts through education
and comprehensive multi-sectoral approaches to
“sexuality” education including curricula
development, improved access to services and
improved public communication in collaboration with
mass media and civil society. What is challenging
and positive about the Mexico Declaration are the
targets it sets out to be achieved by 2015, such as
75% reduction in schools that do not provide
sexuality education and 50% reduction in the number
of adolescents and young people who are not covered
by health services that appropriately cater to their
sexual and reproductive health needs.
I note, too, that two years prior to the Mexico
Declaration, in June 2006, the CARICOM Council of
Human and Social Development produced The
Port-of-Spain Declaration on the Education Sector
Response to HIV, placing emphasis on universal
access to HIV prevention care and treatment,
development of professional and scholarly approaches
to effective school health, professionalising the
fields of Health and Family Life Education, sexual
education and the establishment of a Caribbean
Network of HIV Coordinators in the education sector
as a CARICOM-led regional resource.
Today, I see this ECOSOC Ministerial Review as a
conjuncture of the initiatives of Mexico and Port of
Spain that is connected with a series of other
commitments, global, regional and national and that
seek to impose some coherence in how we move forward
with collaborative approach in the fight against HIV
in Latin America and the Caribbean
There is no need for me to repeat the glaring
statistics of the success and failures to this
gathering with respect to prevention of
mother-to-child transmission, the prevention of HIV
transmission among the general and most vulnerable
population and of HIV transmission through
transfusion. There is no need for me to stress that
with few exceptions in Latin America and the
Caribbean, for every five persons on antiretroviral
treatment, there are ten new infections, and that
among the major threats to destabilizing the gains
made in prevention, care and treatment, is the
pervasiveness of stigma and discrimination. The
statistics for the Caribbean are vividly illustrated
in a 2008 publication by UNAIDS aptly called
Keeping the Score.
In addition, the background paper for this
Meeting: Implementing the Internationally Agreed
Goals and Commitments with regard to Public Health:
HIV in Latin America and the Caribbean is
replete with information of the mixed score card of
the achievements of the LAC countries in tackling
HIV. It signals the fact that there is no room for
complacency. It is clear that the disease is fueled
by unprotected sex and that this main mode of
transmission constitutes a disproportionate impact
on a number of vulnerable groups (women, drug users,
prison populations, migrants, indigenous populations
and youth). In this regard the most at-risk
groups include men who have sex with men and sex
workers, both male and female.
What is clear is that the impact to which we
refer is not matched by comprehensive prevention,
care and treatment programmes that reach these
groups effectively. A significant conclusion in the
background paper drawn from a series of empirical
data is “the persistence of social norms, beliefs
and legal policy barriers combine to create highly
stigmatized environments where discrimination,
homophobia and violence against certain groups
thrive, augmenting the impact on those already at
high risk for HIV infection”
How do we move forward with an agenda that helps
to resolve the dilemmas we face?
Starkly put, after 25 years into the disease
there is yet no cure. Notwithstanding the copious
declarations and pronouncements, behaviour
modification is slow to take root and stigma and
discrimination, persist.
As we meet here today it is significant that we
are at the half way point between two landmark
events: UNGASS (2001) where the global
articulation of the issues and advocacy for an
accelerated approach to HIV led to the establishment
of the Global Fund for HIV TB and Malaria (GFATM)
and the Millennium Development Goal (2015).
As we meet here today, our region (LAC) is
plagued by the global economic and financial crisis
with implications for exacerbating the region’s
economic vulnerabilities and compounded by the
prospects that investments in the region’s HIV
response may be compromised.
Some strategies in the accelerated approach to
HIV
There is a wide range of strategies that may be
considered in the accelerated approach to HIV, and
which applies to both Latin America and the
Caribbean. However I would only focus briefly on six
illustrations:
i. Maintenance investments in HIV
UNAIDS reports that an estimated US$13.7billion
was invested in the AIDS response in 2008. It is
also worth noting that the international community
has responded to the need for resources to curb the
spread of the epidemic with a six-fold increase in
funding between 2001-2007. Latin America and the
Caribbean has benefited from resources in terms of
loans and grants from international development
banks and support from bilateral agencies such as
the US Presidential Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR),
DFID (UK), CIDA (Canada) and GTZ (Germany), among
others. Increase resources from national budgets are
a further demonstration. Yet all reports and
analysis of the global situation and comparable
indications for the LAC region point in the
direction of a shortfall such that “ needs” for the
HIV response, outstrip available resources by far.
ii. Improving effectiveness of investments
In the context of scarce resources it is
important to improve the effectiveness of
investments in the HIV response. A strategy that
seems to work, is the creation of partnerships,
pooling resources, sharing information on best
practices , constant evaluation of processes,
through monitoring and evaluation techniques Among
the examples of effectiveness of investments are
those that have been catalyzed by institutional
responses that engage networks at national, regional
and international levels. Barbados for
example, has developed a broad based multi-sectoral
involvement of line ministries with corresponding
budgets for AIDS related activities , with positive
implications for cost saving simultaneously with
increasing the impact of HIV relief in that country
The Horizontal Technical Cooperation Group, a
network of Government and civil society in Latin
America headquartered in Brazil, brings together a
cross section of HIV Stakeholders bi-annually in
FORO, to identify regional priorities and elaborate
relevant and common policies
The Pan Caribbean Partnership on HIV/AIDS (PANCAP)
brings together 29 Governments, NGOs and other key
partners across the sectors, and regional and
international agencies to establish and implement
regional priorities with national impact. In
achieving its objectives, the Caribbean Regional
Strategic Framework is pivotal.
iii. Human Rights and social justice
programmes that place emphasis on universal
access to prevention care and treatment and on
reduction of stigma and discrimination
Universal access to HIV prevention, treatment
care and support by 2010 is regarded as the stimulus
package that governments agreed to at the United
Nations General Assembly in 2006. This is the kernel
of goal 6 of the MDGs: halting and reversing the
spread of HIV by 2015. However a sustainable
approach to achieving this goal is to incorporate in
national and regional HIV plans, activities that
address multi-sectoral strategies of
the epidemic including gender equity, human and
social justice programmes that seek to revamp
out-dated legislative instruments, adequate
nutrition as a basis of successful adherence to
treatment of PLWA and alleviation of poverty. In so
doing the HIV response also address the broader
drivers of development.
iv. Strengthening public health systems
The strengthening of public health systems is
important for increasing the opportunities for
treatment of PLWA, for community care support
services, increasing equity in treatment and
coverage and reducing treatment costs. The
background paper, prepared for this meeting, makes a
case for integrating prevention, care, treatment and
support into the public health system. There is some
evidence from the experience of Barbados, Brazil and
Mexico that this contributes toward the reduction of
stigma and discrimination and at the same time
increases the numbers of persons that “get tested”
for HIV.
In the case of treatment costs, the negotiations
for cheaper pharmaceuticals are an important
complementary policy. It involves the exploiting the
TRIPS flexibilities as demonstrated by Brazil. But
perhaps one of the most rewarding and exhilarating
experiences from CARICOM was the success achieved by
the collective group of Ministers of Health from the
Caribbean Community negotiating with six
pharmaceutical companies and securing a reduction of
up to 90-percent for a range of ARVs, which
culminated in the signature of an agreement at the
Thirteenth International AIDS Conference in
Barcelona in July 2002.
v. Recommitting to the "three (3) ones"
principle
I believe that the PanCaribbean Partnership
against HIV is an embodiment of this principle which
accounts for its success so far. But the
sustainability of this principle is highly dependent
on the pursuit of a harmonization strategy, in which
developing partners’ support for the Caribbean
Regional Strategic Framework places emphasis on
reducing the duplication in onerous reporting
requirements and in which multilateral agencies
adopt a more enlightened policy of support for small
middle income countries. It is necessary that
countries of the LAC region hold firm in their
advocacy for the international agencies to change
the conditionalities that rob countries like the
Bahamas, Barbados and even St. Kitts from access to
concessional funding.
vi. Support for People Living with HIV
Finally, the heart of our concern rests with
people living with HIV and those affected by HIV. An
interesting finding in the background document
provided for this meeting is that an increasing
number of Persons Living with HIV and AIDS (PLWA)
are aware of their status and are surviving because
of antiretroviral treatment. This fact provides an
enormous prevention opportunity and proper
counseling at testing centres and health facilities.
But what it also means is that programmes and
policies must be put in place to ensure the
availability of legal protection and social support
and support networks and self help groups. In the
final analysis it is important to support
initiatives to encourage greater involvement of PLWA.
CONCLUSION
I have tried to sketch the scenarios that appear
to be among the major concerns for this Forum, and
to identify some of the strategies that ought to
form part of a programme and design toward an
accelerated approach to HIV. I am sure that in the
special panels that follow you will embark on a more
systematic set of discussions and arrive at
important decisions. What is clear is that both the
Health and Education sectors have a critical role to
play in this accelerated approach.
Hopefully this meeting will form the basis of a
longer term and sustainable partnership, providing a
paradigm shift that contributes to radical behaviour
change, purposive reduction in stigma and
discrimination, achieving universal access to
prevention, treatment care and support and involving
people living with HIV in fashioning a sustainable
and successful response to HIV.
In this regard I hope that these remarks
contribute in some way to the deliberations at this
important Annual Ministerial Review.
CONTACT:
piu@caricom.org