Introduction
It is an honour and privilege to be granted this
opportunity to address on behalf of the
Secretary-General of the Caribbean Community
(CARICOM), this Public Hearing devoted to a Review
of Economic Growth and Development of the Caribbean
Region. My statement will be focussed on the reality
and experience of the integration grouping which
comprises fifteen small island and low lying
developing states of the Caribbean Community
CARICOM. These states are Antigua and Barbuda, The
Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Grenada,
Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, St Kitts and
Nevis, Saint Lucia, St. Vincent & the Grenadines,
Suriname and Trinidad and Tobago.
These countries, notwithstanding their small
size, have much in common with the United States.
They share a commitment to freedom, democracy, rule
of law, and to the improvement of the lives of their
people through peaceful development and security of
their borders.
Regional Integration
In order to overcome the limitations deriving
from small size and other development challenges,
the countries of the Region have embarked on a
systematic programme of economic integration which
is reflected in their intention to fully implement
by 2015, the CARICOM Single Market and Economy (CSME),
in keeping with the commitment in the Revised Treaty
of Chaguaramas. This single economic space is
expected to provide the springboard for the Region
to advance the process of integrating into the
global economy.
This deliberate process of regional economic
integration began in 1968 with the formation of the
Caribbean Free Trade Area (CARIFTA) with principal
focus on trade in goods. This was deepened into the
Caribbean Community and Common Market (CARICOM) in
1973 which strengthened the economic integration
arrangements, included a foreign policy component,
as well as cooperation in functional and social
areas.
In 1989, the Heads of Government of the Caribbean
Community took a major decision to create a Single
Market and Economy (CSME). The Single Market became
operational in January 2006 among twelve Member
States. Of the others, Haiti is in the process of
putting arrangements in place to participate.
Montserrat, a British Dependency, is awaiting the
necessary instrument of entrustment. The Bahamas has
decided not to participate at this time.
We wish to take this opportunity to commend the
Government of the United States for the HOPE Act of
2006 in favour of our sister state Haiti. For our
part, the Caribbean Community has been and will
continue to provide assistance to Haiti to
facilitate its smooth entry into the Community and
the CSME, and to be able to fully participate in all
aspects of the integration movement.
The essential characteristics of the Single
Market are free trade in goods and services,
movement of labour and capital, and the right of
establishment.
The operationalisation of the Single Economy has
begun to gather momentum with the completion date
set for 2015. This would involve the harmonization
of monetary, fiscal and economic policies including
Financial Policy Harmonization and the adoption of a
CARICOM Financial Services Agreement, Investment and
Incentive Policy Harmonization, and Sectoral policy
harmonisation with respect to industry, agriculture
and transportation.
A critical element of the regional integration
process is the implementation of a CARICOM
Development Fund as provided for in the Revised
Treaty of Chaguaramas. The Fund is designed to
provide financial and technical assistance to
disadvantaged countries, regions and sectors to
assist in the transformation of the economies of
Member States, enhance their competitiveness and
facilitate their insertion into the global economy.
The Fund will become operational later this year.
Regional integration constitutes an important
strategy for optimising the development
possibilities of the Caribbean Community, based on a
pooling of resources and as a means of ensuring
effective participation in the global economy.
However, creation of a Single Market and Economy is
not by itself sufficient to solve the problems of
small size, vulnerability and sustainability. The
Community is therefore actively engaged in the
expansion of trade and economic relations with third
states. In this regard, CARICOM’s relations with the
US, Canada and the European Union come readily to
mind. The Region is also advancing its relations
with Latin America and with other countries.
CARICOM Development Challenges
The economy of the Caribbean Community is at an
important juncture. The critical challenge being
faced is how to give effect to the meaningful
insertion of CARICOM into the rapidly changing
global economy. Although some of these countries
have achieved commendable levels of per capita
income and also rank reasonably well on the United
Nations Human Development Index (HDI), there are
still significant challenges to overcome.
CARICOM is also characterized by varying levels
of development among its Member States. This is
recognized in the Community’s Charter - The Revised
Treaty of Chaguaramas - which designates six
countries as More Developed (MDCs) and nine as Less
Developed Countries (LDCs). It is against this
background that we should view the Region’s economic
policies and performance and its capacity for
sustained development.
CARICOM’s LDCs for example, are among the least
diversified economies in the Region with a great
dependence on one or two economic sectors.
Compounding the issue is the fact that these
countries are largely open economies and as a result
are susceptible to external shocks. In this regard,
the Governor of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank
has cited rising food and fuel prices and the
declining value of the US dollar to which their
currency is pegged, as immediate challenges facing
this group of countries.
In addition to their economic vulnerabilities the
development of CARICOM Member States is also
constrained by their ecological fragility,
susceptibility to natural disasters, notably
hurricanes and the impact of climate change. In the
aftermath of natural disasters, Governments have to
embark on costly rebuilding programmes. In 2004,
Grenada’s economy was totally wiped out within five
hours by Hurricane Ivan. The economy and
infrastructure are still being rebuilt. Similarly,
the impact of climate change and its consequences
for sea level rise has become a growing
preoccupation, given its potential to cause
significant economic disruption in small islands and
low–lying coastal states of our Community. It is a
tragic irony that countries which contribute the
least to global warming are the most directly
impacted.
The situation in CARICOM is not entirely
negative. While agriculture continues to be the main
sector in some Member States, others have sought to
diversify their economies through the development of
the manufacturing and services sectors, including
tourism and financial services. In some of the
countries, the services sector has become the lead
economic driver accounting for as much as ninety per
cent of output in the LDCs. In the MDCs such as The
Bahamas, Barbados and Jamaica this sector makes a
very significant contribution to growth.
The Region’s efforts to develop its services
sector have not been without difficulty.
Developments in the international community and
unfriendly trading stances adopted by developed
countries, including some of their main trading
partners, have sought to frustrate these efforts.
One such example relates to offshore financial
services. Another concerns Internet Gaming, which
despite a WTO ruling in favour of a CARICOM Member
State remains an issue as a result of non-compliance
with the ruling by the major developed country in
our hemisphere.
More recently, CARICOM was forced to make strong
representation to achieve the attenuation of US
policy which would have resulted in a reduction in
US tourist arrivals in CARICOM.
More generally, the global trade regime which is
aimed at the creation of a more liberalised trade
environment has created special challenges for the
CARICOM Member States and has emphasised the need
for increased productivity in order to enable the
countries of the Region to compete effectively in
the global economy. The need for improved
competitiveness through the transformation of
existing production structures, the increased
application of technology as well as improved
organisational arrangements has become a major
preoccupation of policy makers in government and
also in the private sector as we expand our trading
relations with third states.
CARICOM/US Trade and Economic Relations
In January 1984, CARICOM/US trade relations were
formalised under the Caribbean Basin Economic
Recovery Act (CBERA) adopted by the US Congress in
an effort to stimulate increased trade with the
Caribbean by granting duty free access for a wide
range of goods to the US market. The subsequent
Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act (CBTPA) which
entered into force in 2000 expanded the list of duty
free products which some beneficiary states can
export into the US. However, CARICOM Member States
have been unable to take full advantage of these
preferential arrangements mainly due to capacity
constraints.
CBERA provided a significant impetus to the
development of the apparel industry particularly in
Jamaica and Haiti with exports targetted to the US
market. However, while the industry continues to
grow in Haiti because of its competitive wage
structure, it has declined significantly in Jamaica
with the advent of NAFTA. Overall CARICOM exports to
the US have been skewed in favour of a few countries
producing a limited range of goods. Petroleum and
related products have been, by far, the major
exports from the Region. During the period 2000 to
2002 CARICOM recorded negative trade balances with
the US. Beginning 2003, CARICOM experienced a
turnaround in export performance recording positive
trade balances up to 2005, the highest being US$2.7
billion recorded in 2005.
However, if one were to exclude exports from
Trinidad and Tobago which comprised largely
petroleum and related products, the Region would
record negative trade balances over the entire
period 2000 to 2005.
The impact of the preferential arrangement has
therefore not been as broad based as envisioned.
In order for the Region to be better able to take
advantage of access arrangements to the US market,
assistance is needed to address the issues relating
to production capacity, particularly in the private
sector. Such support could be in the form of
technical assistance and infrastructure-related “aid
for trade”, research and development, and investment
and trade promotion events. In this regard, the
Caribbean Community’s capacity in the area of trade
facilitation and custom procedures will be soon
strengthened through assistance from the US.
Attracting investment continues to be a priority
for the countries of our Region. At present,
investment into the Region is concentrated in one or
two countries; but the entire Region is open for
business and, to this end, the CARICOM Investment
Code will soon be in place. The Code is intended to
make the Caribbean Community a single investment
location rather than one with different
jurisdictions. CARICOM therefore welcomes investors
from the USA to seek their respective market niches
in the enabling business environment via
wholly-owned or joint venture arrangements.
The efforts of the Region to enhance its
competitiveness through increased productivity and
to attract investment have assumed added
significance given that aid flows in recent years
have declined. In addition, many countries have been
graduated from World Bank concessionary financing.
While the decline in aid flows has been partially
offset through increased FDI inflows to some
countries, the concentration of these resources in a
few countries contributes to continued economic
disparity. Where some CARICOM countries have been
able to secure resources on the international
financial markets, this has tended to be on
crippling commercial terms with attendant
consequences for macroeconomic management.
CARICOM/US Trade and Economic Relationship –
2008 and Beyond
CARICOM/US relations were given a significant
boost with the holding of the first Summit between
their Leaders in 1997, which resulted in the
adoption of the Bridgetown Declaration “Partnership
for Prosperity and Security”, whose elements remain
relevant today. The importance of the relations was
further advanced by the convening of the Conference
on the Caribbean, in Washington in June 2007 which
culminated with the second summit between Heads of
State and Government of the United States of America
and of the Caribbean Community Nations.
The timing of this Public Hearing is therefore
propitious as it allows representatives of the
Caribbean Community to share with US counterparts
their views on how to build on the principles set
out by the Heads of State and Government.
CARICOM contends that a new relationship with the
United States in the 21st century should have as its
primary objective, the acceleration of the pace of
development of the countries of the Region while
promoting stability and the preservation of their
democratic traditions. To that end, I draw attention
to what might be considered as elements for a more
mature CARICOM/US trade and economic relationship.
First, CARICOM/US trade relations should be
enhanced and placed on a permanent and more
predictable footing. One way of achieving this would
be for the US to lock-in the CBTPA preferences which
expire in September this year into permanent
legislation under CBERA and include all CARICOM
Member States as beneficiaries. In addition, the US
should broaden the categories of CARICOM products
eligible for preferential access to its markets.
CARICOM exporters could also benefit from more
flexible Rules of Origin for exports to the United
States. In this regard, the ‘cumulation principle’
should be preserved and further strengthened. This
would enable enterprises to combine inputs from
eligible countries in the Region in the production
of goods and services.
Second, the services sector which is the fastest
growing in the Region, contributes between 60 to 90
per cent of the economic output in Member States.
This is clearly an area that needs to be taken into
account and be explicitly provided for in any future
CARICOM-US trade relations. Enhancement of the
CARICOM-US trade and economic relationship along
these lines, with development as its foundation,
could only lead to mutually beneficial outcomes for
both partners.
Third, as CARICOM seeks to promote the
transformation of the economies of its Member States
through their access to the resources and technical
assistance to be provided by the CARICOM Development
Fund, there is a role for the US, its long standing
partner.
Fourth, capacity-building assistance to allow
regional industries to capitalise on export
opportunities is another area in which the US could
be supportive of CARICOM. This should include
training and technical assistance to address
sanitary and phytosanitary requirements and other
technical regulations and standards applied by the
US.
Fifth, any new and enhanced trading relationship
between CARICOM and the US should take into account
the differences in the level of development between
the two parties and among CARICOM countries
themselves, as recognized by the Treaty of
Chaguramas. In short, the principle of special and
differential treatment should be a feature of any
new arrangements.
The revitalised CARICOM-United States Trade and
Investment Council (TIC) is expected to play an
important part in the furthering of the enhanced
trade and economic relationship.
Conclusion
In closing, I wish to express appreciation to
Congressman Charles Rangel for his initiative which
has led to this Public Hearing. By his initiative he
has been true to the Joint Statement issued by the
Heads of State and Government of the United States
of America and of the Caribbean Community Nations on
the occasion of the Conference on the Caribbean held
here in Washington DC last June. The Heads of State
and Government declared, inter alia;
“We recognize the establishment of the CARICOM
Single Market and Economy as a critical element of
the growth and development strategy of the Caribbean
Community.
We are determined to strengthen our existing
trade arrangements. We acknowledge President Bush’s
announcement to work with Congress to extend and
update the Caribbean Basin Trade Promotion Act and
the 1991 Trade and Investment Framework Agreement.
We further commit to the harmonisation of customs
procedures consistent with global standards and the
advancement of technical trade cooperation.
We reiterate our support for Caribbean efforts
to expand the services sector, and encourage a focus
on the international financial services sector to
facilitate a competitive means of economic
diversification while remaining committed to the
maintenance of appropriate regulatory and
supervisory practices, consistent with the highest
international standards”.
Mr Chairman, I thank you and the other
Commissioners for this opportunity to make a
statement at this Public Hearing.
I thank you.